The Reduced Form of Litigation Selection Models and the Plaintiff’s Win Rate
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I develop a new approach—the reduced form approach—to studying the plaintiff’s win rate in one-shot litigation selection models. A reduced form requires three basic elements. First, a joint distribution of plaintiff’s and defendant’s beliefs concerning the probability that the plaintiff would win in the event a dispute were litigated. Second, a conditional win rate function that returns the actual probability the plaintiff would win if the case were litigated, given the parties’ subjective beliefs. Third, a reduced form requires a specification of a litigation rule, which tells us the probability that a case will be litigated given the two parties’ subjective probabilities. I use the reduced form to prove several general results. First, I show that the plaintiff’s win rate will always equal one-half when certain balance conditions on the conditional win rate function, joint density, and litigation rule all hold. Second, I show that when these balance conditions are systematically violated in the same direction, the plaintiff’s win rate will deviate from one-half in a predictable direction. Third, I prove that any plaintiff’s win rate between 0 and 1 is possible, even in the limit as party information becomes very good, and even without the kind of asymmetric information that Shavell (1996) has suggested is the key to generating this result. Fourth, I show via a simple constructive example that there is no reason to expect the plaintiff’s win rate to move in a predictable direction when legal rules change, contra the optimistic conclusions in Klerman & Lee (2014) concerning the empirical usefulness of plaintiff’s win rate data. ∗For helpful comments and suggestions, I thank Daniel Klerman, Jon Klick, Alex Lee, Rick Brooks, Charles Silver, Steven Salop, Sarath Sanga, David Schleicher, Joshua Teitelbaum, Abe Wickelgren, and participants at ALEA 2014, the Yale-Paris 2 Summer School in Law and Economics, and workshops at Georgetown and the University of Texas.
منابع مشابه
The Reduced Form of Litigation Models and the Plaintiff's Win Rate
In this paper I introduce what I call the reduced form approach to studying the plaintiff’s win rate in litigation selection models. A reduced form comprises a joint distribution of plaintiff’s and defendant’s beliefs concerning the probability that the plaintiff would win in the event a dispute were litigated; a conditional win rate function that tells us the actual probability of a plaintiff ...
متن کاملBackground Note for Law & Economics Workshop Students Concerning The Reduced Form of Litigation Selection Models and the Plaintiff's Win Rate
Issues related to the plaintiff’s win rate in litigated cases have been discussed, and contested, for more than 30 years. In a seminal paper, Priest and Klein (1984) pointed out that it’s not an accident that some cases are litigated while others aren’t. Consider a simple litigation system that has essentially no procedural law. When disputes materialize, the parties may take them to court for ...
متن کاملThreats to sue and cost divisibility under asymmetric information
The early literature on litigation and settlement assumed that a plaintiff’s threat to litigate is credible only when her litigation value—the difference between the expected judgment and her litigation costs—is positive. More recently, however, Bebchuk (1996) has suggested that even if the plaintiff’s litigation value is negative, divisibility of her litigation costs may render credibility to ...
متن کاملModels of Juvenile Procedure in modern Iran's criminal law
Studying and exploring the patterns governing each subject leads to a systematic categorization of that subject and a better explanation of the developments of that subject in the course of history. Responses to the delinquency of children and adolescents in response to the delicate and vulnerable attitude of these people has undergone various developments and has seen various policy-makings by...
متن کاملAccentuate the Positive : Defending Antitrust Litigation By Demonstrating the Procompetitive Character of the Challenged Conduct
BY DAVID L. MEYER AND ROBERT M. NICHOLS F or many defendants in antitrust litigation, the procompetitive nature of their alleged conduct is a topic near the bottom of the list of subjects they want to address. They would prefer to first exhaust all of the available avenues for avoiding full-blown merits litigation—and all of the costs and burdens that discovery and trial can bring. There is the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015